Police investigating themselves… no more?

Yesterday in the news there were various reports that the Liberal Government is abolishing the current police complaint scheme that has existed in BC and switching it to a system that is one where police complaints are investigated and handled by a civilian-led commission, rather than ‘the police investigating the police’. This is great news for British Columbia, though it a LONG overdue. (Story here)

I know and fully appreciate that police officers have a very difficult job. I think we can all agree on that. The individuals who sign up for this job also appreciate that they will be held to an extremely higher standard in the manner in which they conduct themselves – on and off – the job. But it is when police officers stray from this high standard of conduct and find themselves embroiled in controversial actions that could see their conduct as disgraceful (a term found in the Police Act) or even unlawful, is when we need to carefully consider how to handle the situation.

When a police officer is charged with a criminal offence (such as assault, uttering threats, possession or distribution of illegal narcotics, impaired driving etc) most usually a police force from a different jurisdiction other than the one the accused works for will handle the investigation and correspond with Crown prosecutors.However, criminal charges against a police officer are often coupled with a Police Act investigation that will determine (separately from the criminal process) whether the officer’s actions violated that high standard of conduct that not only the Police Act stipulates, but that we as citizens expect from our police officers.

When these Police Act investigations occur, they are conducted by senior officers, either from within the same detachment as the subject of the complaint, or sometimes (often due to public outrage in recent cases) farmed out to a police force in another jurisdiction in an (lame) attempt to give off the impression that the investigation is “independent”. Right.

The Blue Wall

I’m writing about this topic because I have seen firsthand how our current police complaints procedures have failed us. Miserably. I will describe a case of mine as an example of how “police investigating police” just doesn’t work….

My client JW was leaving a pub on a Saturday night in the Kitsilano area of Vancouver when a rather agitated sergeant (Sgt. DT) from the Vancouver Police Department came on the scene in his police car and began yelling and swearing at people to “hurry up and go home”. My client (and numerous other witnesses) tells me that Sgt. DT drove his police car up on the curb of the sidewalk, threatened people over his loudspeaker, then exited his vehicle and began using his police baton in a very threatening and intimidating manner towards people. Please understand that these people were simple leaving the pub at closing time and trying to make their way home by walking, waiting for rides, and hailing taxi cabs. Oh, and I have the CCTV video to prove it. (actual story is here: http://tinyurl.com/63kfmme)

On the video my client is seen walking down the street, texting on his cell phone, when Sgt. DT comes sprinting at JW, full speed, and cross-checks him in the neck with his baton, sending JW flying on to his back, hitting his head on the sidewalk. JW suffered only minor injuries. Luckily.

Now, as I said, we managed to secure the CCTV footage of the event. We have 30 minutes of tape that shows a peaceful area, calm and order. The only person who acted violently was Sgt. DT, who we later learned was a 23-yr veteran of the VPD. We were all shocked.

Sgt. DT was convicted of assault and the courts did their job in handling Sgt. DT’s criminal matters. I am not going to go into detail about that process. It is the Police Act investigation that is an absolute JOKE.

We filed a complaint with the Police Complaints Commissioner and learned that the person who would be in charge of the Police Act investigation would be Sgt. JK, a 21-yr veteran of the Vancouver Police Department. “You have got to be fucking kidding me?!” I said to myself AND the Police Complaints Commisioner – on numerous occasions.

So here we have a 21-yr veteran of the VPD investigating a 23-yr veteran of the VPD. These are two senior officers who have worked alongside one another for virtually their entire careers. And Sgt. JK assured me that “I am confident that I can do this in an unbiased manner”. I called bullshit from the very beginning. (and I was right…. )

This was a high-profile case. Everyone in Vancouver read about it in the papers and it was splashed all over the news, largely because we had the incident “caught on tape”. I kicked and screamed to the Complaint Commissioner that this investigation could not properly proceed in this way. They disagreed, and let the investigation continue….

This incident happened about 18 months ago and the VPD investigators asked for, and was granted, extension after extension in order to complete his report. I had basically thrown my hands up and given up all hope on this file, when I got a surprising call from the Complaint Commissioner. He said that Sgt. JK had submitted his Report for final approval and that the Commissioner felt that there were many oversights within it, witnesses not properly interviewed, basically, it was garbage. The Commissioner then decided that this investigation had to be switched to someone new……… so they handed it off to someone else, this new investigator was ALSO a member of the VPD. I hope that you can see the sarcastic smile of disbelief on my face while you read this.

So one VPD investigator couldn’t do the job properly of investigating one of his colleagues of a serious complaint, so the Commissioner handed it off to another person within the VPD to tidy it up. Police cannot and should not investigate themselves. It does not work. If bias does not actually exist, it sure gives off the impression that it does exist or that it COULD exist.

The investigation is still ongoing. With the change of investigators, the VPD got another extension. 18+ months later I am more convinced than ever that we need a civilian-based investigation scheme when complaints are levied at the police.

Why do you think of the liberals proposals to change the system to a civilian-led body?

Why Should You Hire a Criminal Attorney?

Our lawyers at Tarnow Criminal Law are dedicated to providing their clients with the best legal representation available. When you retain the services of our firm, you can expect to receive frequent correspondence, individualized attention, and professional wisdom at each stage of your case. They can explain your rights under the law so that nothing is left unclear or misunderstood. In addition, they are dedicated to building strong and compelling cases, and doing whatever is necessary to ensure a desirable verdict is achieved.

There is no question that your choice in criminal defence lawyer is not just important, it is personal. That is why we offer a free initial consultation to discuss your particular charges, giving you the opportunity to ask a skilled criminal defence professional any questions you have on your mind – and in a confidential setting. It’s important to take the opportunity to meet with a lawyer and go over the facts of your case before hiring one. By addressing your immediate concerns and helping you better understand the situation, we hope to make the decision regarding your legal counsel that much easier to make. It’s an opportunity to meet the lawyer who will be protecting your rights and freedom in the coming months.